Showing posts with label Netflix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Netflix. Show all posts

Saturday, April 19, 2014

The West Wing


The West Wing had it's natural television run while I was in college for the most part, which means I was oblivious.  I was aware that many people watched the show but not a whole lot more than that.  I also figured that if most of America watched it, it was probably middle-of-the-line politics so as not to offend one side or the other... I was so wrong!

The West Wing came back on my radar when I saw it available on Netflix.  Being sick, I had the time on my hands to give the series a proper watch.  What I saw was nothing short of thought-provoking, inspiring, aspirational television.  I love that the issues were debated and both sides were brought up, even if the show ultimately lands far to the liberal side of issues.  I loved the first entrance of Martin Sheen's mesmerizing President Bartlet.  I loved, when in one episode, they gave me goosebumps by simply declaring "I serve at the pleasure of the president."  I love that the name "Bin Laden" was dropped in a chillingly casual manner in an episode that aired in 1999.  I love recognizing actors who would come to be known on other shows.  And I love that I watched Psych before I watched The West Wing and that only made me appreciate Dule Hill's Charlie Young even more!


For me, the fact that The West Wing introduced characters who had flaws and made mistakes only strengthened the depths of those characters because we got to be aware that they all fundamentally wanted to do the right thing for the right reasons.  I love that the President is almost always the smartest man in the room.  (Without getting too political, I know there are real Presidents about whom the same could not be said).  I loved the honor with which they show him overcoming adversity without sugar-coating those things in his life that were, in fact, adverse.  I love that these characters challenge each other and respect each other and demonstrate their intelligence in each episode.  Sam Seaborn, Josh Lyman, Toby Ziegler, CJ Cregg, Leo McGarry and others are idealists, while being imperfect human beings.  It is how I would love to imagine the White House to truly exist.

This is well-made television, particularly the first 3-4 seasons, although I am glad it ran the course it did.  To transition the Bartlet administration out of office seems like a fitting way to transition its viewing audience away from their habitual watching.  In fact, while I do think the show shifted a bit after Sorkin left, the only thing I could not wrap my head around was the arc for Toby in the final season.  I won't go into it here yet because I'm going to encourage people who have not seen this show to watch it.  Plus, I may feel the need to write about this show in seasons or particular episodes.  I am just not sure.  Of course, it would have been more fitting for John Spencer to end the show with the rest of the cast, but he had certainly already made a mark with his character.  Anyway, agree with it, disagree with it, it doesn't matter.  It matters that it is impossible not to think about it.  And isn't that what all television should aspire to?

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Haven (Season 1)


Ok, so oddly enough... even though I can't grasp what exactly I like about Haven, I find it pretty addicting.  I finished Season 1, although it was only 13 episodes, so not crazy long.  The lead actress to me still isn't quite standing out but in the moment, while I'm watching, I like her.  She reminds me too much of other actresses though, like a combination of Maggie Grace, Stana Katic, Anna Paquin, Robin Tunney and Mariska Hargitay.  But not really as good of an actress as any of them.  (Well, Robin Tunney is questionable, in my opinion).

I recognized only two people from the first season.  I'm used to seeing supporting actors and trying to figure out what else I've seen them in but so far I'm not recognizing anyone except for a guy who was killed off in the first episode of Buffy and the female lead from The Dead Zone (and she was only in the first episode).

I like that there are elements of a procedural show here but it is spun in a way I haven't seen before, except perhaps in Fringe.  There are obvious similarities between the two shows and Fringe comes out on top of all the categories except that I would say Haven looks a little prettier.  But seriously:
- Science Fiction?  Check
- Blonde lead female FBI Agent?  Check
- Stoic African-American Superior FBI Agent?  Check
- Characters who are somewhat helpful and yet obviously not telling you everything they know?  Check
- Blonde lead, with two male co-leads?  Check
- Mysterious cases to investigate that somehow she is right in the middle of?  Check
- Weird occurrences, believed only by our small investigating team?  Check
- Sinister undercurrent?  Check
I could keep going...

What I find intriguing as well as what makes me apprehensive is that there is an over-reaching science fiction arc throughout the whole season.  (And being that it wasn't resolved, I'm assuming throughout at least the next season as well).  We are left with questions about the town of Haven, Maine, its quirky townsfolk, the FBI Chief, and the origins of our main character, Audrey.  The questions are interesting enough to keep me watching but close enough to Lost to make me wonder if they will ever be answered properly or if we're supposed to think that loose ends are good?   I want to hope they will provide answers, but with Lost and The Mentalist, I am beginning to wonder whether hoping for answers is just an exercise in futility.  What is the saying...?  The definition of insanity is doing the exact same thing over and over again while expecting a different result?  Are these television shows driving me slowly insane?  Hopefully not.  Until then, I am on to Season 2.

Monday, February 10, 2014

Haven


Just started watching the first few episodes of a show called Haven.  Not sure if any of you have heard of it?  It wasn't my intended pick, as I went on to Netflix to start watching either Almost Human or Justified, but then this show was listed as a top pick for me so I decided to check it out.  So far, it feels like a lesser version of a lot of shows I like, almost an amalgamation of Lost, Fringe, X-Files, Gilmore Girls (for the small town feel), Supernatural and maybe a little Persons Unknown thrown in for flavor.  I looked it up and it airs on the SyFy Channel, which I don't think I have seen anything from before.  That is, if they do other original programming, I don't think I've heard of it, but these days it seems almost every station is starting to do original programming, which I think is very cool.  Diversity and imagination is good for television!  The first few episodes that I've watched have a "monster of the week" feel to them but there are hints that the show may go for a larger arc that may be interesting.   I like the main character, a blonde female FBI agent, but she is no Ana Torv.  Something about the characters so far has not drawn me in.  I don't know what it is, but it doesn't have the quirkiness and immediate draw that most of the other shows I listed above had for me.  The main guy so far seems so bland that I find myself forgetting about him and I don't think I'd recognize him if he was in anything else.  My initial take is if they had found a better male lead, this show might have grabbed me right away.  Anyway, I think I will give this show that I have never heard of a try until it loses my interest or I determine I don't like it.  Maybe neither of those things will happen.  The other series will be there when I need a new one but for today, I think it's fun to have found a potential series to be interested in that yesterday I didn't know existed.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Fringe (Season 4)




I've been watching Fringe lately...  First thing that always comes to mind is that I do not understand how John Noble (Walter) never won an Emmy.  I don't even think he was nominated, which is ridiculous.  His subtle growth as a character and his questionable sanity in the earlier seasons are pretty incredible.  As a show, I think all the actors seem "just right."  I think that's much more clear when they all start playing different versions of themselves and I can always keep straight who is from which universe and yet all the characters are different and real.

I'm glad Fringe was kept on the air as long as it was.  I read somewhere yesterday that it was the lowest rated show at one point and it was still renewed.  So often I wonder why networks cancel perfectly good shows or shows with a lot of potential and in this case a show that was intelligent and interesting was allowed to grow and have a proper conclusion, which is awesome.

I admit I struggled to get through Season 1.  I was wondering if this was going to be another Lost... with so many questions without proper answers but then they started answering questions in unique ways and I think Season 3 was pretty brilliant.  I am in the middle of Season 4 and so far I am feeling a little unsure of the "new" timeline.... Has the character development from the first 3 seasons and the relationships we watched grow between characters all been erased?  I am not sure how it will end up, but at the same time I am impressed that the show took a bold step and has stuck with it so far.  I've read quite a bit about showrunners who change their initial ideas because of fan feedback or fan pressure and I would prefer to just see a series play out the way the people who created it intended.  There have been a few episodes I didn't connect with, but so far this Season has as much potential as the last one.  I've been wanting to get to the end of each episode and see what happens!

To me, Fringe is pretty brilliant.  I am interested and intrigued.  For some reason though, that I haven't put my finger on yet, I am not as emotionally invested in the characters as I have been in other shows, even shows that I would consider much lower quality.  Not sure why, but I definitely encourage people who are looking for interesting, intelligent, sci-fi tv to check it out if you haven't yet.

Monday, January 20, 2014

Law & Order: SVU - Season 11



I just started watching Season 11 of SVU.  I think I'm caught up to this point.  Often this show surprises me with the depth of its content.  It is a procedural so it has its filler episodes, but for the most part it leaves me thinking about something.  Rather than a particular episode (I'm up to Episode 3), I am completely perplexed by this new ADA, played by Christine Lahti.  Is it a joke?  Are they spoofing their own show?  Granted, the previous ADA was too pretty and not all that good of an actor, but you just go with it for the story lines and the main characters.  But right now I'm totally confused.  Lahti's ADA Sonya Paxton has been on the show for three episodes now and has picked a bunch of fights with Detective Stabler, acts like it is a show all about her and at the same time like her character is mentally ill or bipolar or something.  It's bizarre.  She shows up at crime scenes and just starts to insult detectives/policemen, etc who are doing their job...  When she first came on I did a double-take to make sure I hadn't switched over to Saturday Night Live somehow.  I know it's not the most current season but I don't think I will make it there if she's here for the long run.

Also... How many times can Stabler lose his temper and assault whoever is closest to him?!?  In any real world job he'd have been fired many times already! I actually like his character but in all these years he hasn't been able to control his temper or been forced to??